Another Bipolar Writer

I write; therefore, I am!

965 notes

: racism-education: jehovahs: it’s not ‘reverse racism’ when you’re...

abhortion:

yogabbap:

abhortion:

racism-education:

jehovahs:

it’s not ‘reverse racism’ when you’re being racist to whites

it’s racism

No, it isnt. There is an inherent logical fallacy in your argument that will never make it true. However, white people can be discrimated against. Discrimination is different from racism.

Let’s start from the beginning. Your first step is to accept that “a hatred or intolerance of another race” is not the definition of racism. The dictionary is wrong. Get over it.

Racism is when intolerance in government laws, attitudes and ideals of a society are ingrained in a culture to the point where patterns of discrimination towards a certain race are institutionalized asnormal. If you keep this in mind, you’ll understand that reverse racism doesn’t- and can’t- exist.

There is another saying “Racism (or sexism) = prejudice + power. POC (people of color) can be prejudiced against white people. But they can neverhave power, i.e. a whole system of structured support that backs them. White people often don’t understand how much power they have. Just ONE white person has more power to do actual harm to a black person than one hundred black people do to that white person. A white person can KILL a black person without any consequences, while if the situation was reversed you can bet the killer wouldn’t see the outside of a prison cell for a long, long time.

When white people complain about reverse racism, they are not complaining about losing their RIGHTS. What they are complaining about is losing their PRIVILEGE.

White people can never call someone else racist against them because that ‘someone else’ does not have the power to OPPRESS them. The person has the power to be mean.To hurt feelings.But not to OPPRESS.

THAT is the key difference. When a POC is mean to you, they are JUST being mean to you. Their entire society is not ACTIVELY discriminating against and oppressing you. Their society is not one where it is difficult for them to not be racist against you.

But yours is. And you need to accept that.

There are plenty of things wrong with this post and I’m not really sure where to start.

1. You’ve refused to accept jehovahs’ definition of racism (which is implied), with no justification given, apart from “get over it”. Convincing.

2. After dismissing OP’s definition, you’ve then supplied your own definition of racism, with no explanation as to why your definition is more correct than OP’s. Essentially, what you’ve said is “your definition is wrong and mine is right” without saying why. What makes your definition more valid than theirs? What’s to stop me, or anyone else, from doing the exact same thing to you?

3. Even if we do use your definition of racism, the rest of your post doesn’t logically follow from it. In fact, it’s incredibly US-centric, and ignores and erases plenty of PoC countries and cultures around the world. “Racism = prejudice + power” is not the same thing as “POC (people of color) do not have power”. Believe it or not, there are actually countries where PoC are the majority, and countries where PoC have power and white people do not. To pretend or imply that these places to not exist, or are not important, is actually kind of, well, racist. The world is not America: stop making massive sweeping generalisations that may be accurate for your country, but certainly do not hold true elsewhere.

To use a personal example, about 4 years ago in my city, there was a lot of heightened security due to a big event that was occurring, which meant that there were extra security checks and ‘random’ searches everywhere. My white father and uncle, my ethnically Han Chinese mother, and I (I’m mixed, but white-passing) would often get stopped on our way to tourist destinations or restaurants. Every single time we got stopped, they would search through the contents of my mother’s bag, or ask her to go through a metal detector, or get patted down. Not once did my father, uncle, or I get asked to do so. It was fairly obvious that she was constantly being ‘randomly’ stopped and searched because she was Asian, and we were not because we looked white. I’m sure we can all agree that this is racial profiling and extremely racist.

The city was Beijing, and it was during the 2008 Olympics. In other words, it occurred in China, a country in which Chinese people (or more specifically, the Han Chinese) hold institutional power. Using your “racism = prejudice + power” definition, this means that people who are Han Chinese (and not white people!) cannot experience racism in China. And yet, the above incident was a clear example of an Asian person experiencing racism in an Asian-majority country where Asians had institutional power. This was not an isolated incident either, but one example of many, where Chinese people may face discrimination and yes, racism, in China, for being Chinese. Needless to say, non-Chinese people in China also do face racism for being non-Chinese, but that’s another discussion.

Unless you are about to argue that racial profiling is not racist, what my mother experienced was racism. What she did not experience, and what you have defined above, is institutional racism. That is the problem with the prejudice + power definition: whilst in places such as the US, the idea of ‘reverse racism’ may be laughable to some, it can be a serious problem in other countries. Your neat little definition actually erases the experience of many people in other counties, including PoC. It’s damaging, it’s incorrect, and is almost always used synonymously with “white people can’t experience racism”, which is not the same thing at all.

Stop equating your US- and Euro-centric experiences with the rest of the world

Wow you really don’t get it. Just because a certain race or ethnicity is the majority in a given country does not mean they hold the power. You said your mother was repeatedly stopped while everyone other white person in your family was not. That’s because they are upholding white supremacy values. So yes, racism does equal power + prejudice because white people have social mobility (power) wherever they go, which is something people of color do not have

Are you seriously saying Chinese people do not hold institutional power in China? I merely provided one example of how Chinese people are disadvantaged in their own country due to their race; I could go on to give examples of how non-Chinese people are disadvantaged in China due to their race. Are you honestly implying that Chinese people are so weak that they do not have power in their own county? 

You know nothing about China, and I’m feeling a lot of second-hand embarrassment for you right now. Please stop discussing race relations in China before you make yourself look like even more of an idiot.

Filed under racism discrimination social issues power

50,876 notes

fuckyeahcharacterdevelopment:

cardofrage:

that-sounds-like-a-porno-wade:

I don’t know if anyone has ever done this before but, here ya go… The Different Types of Fanfiction! 

I probably left a few out, but these are the most common, compared to their base fiction’s canon plot. Enjoy! XD

The crack fic is enough for a reblog.

My favorite part is when authors write these themselves, and then you have a big, shiny, convoluted map that’s all canon.

Evangelion would be its own genre of fanfiction.

(Source: goodboydummy, via writeworld)

Filed under fan fiction writing

4 notes

FREE WRITING 28

It would be nice if i could tell you what my mood would be tomorrow. What it’d be the next day, the day after. For the next week, few weeks, even the next six months. It’d be nice if I could give you certainty.

But I can’t.

People would be in my shoes and say to themselves: “Hey, that just makes tomorrow more fun!”

But I can’t.

I look at myself and say: “No, I don’t want to hurt anyone.”

Filed under free writing prose fiction creative writing

9,319 notes

cokekitty:

OpenDyslexic is a free-to-use font that is designed to help those with dyslexia read better. The text is weighted, having a heavier bottom, which is thought to increase readability for dyslexic people. You can download it for free here.
I don’t have dyslexia myself, but in the event any of my followers do, I thought I’d share. Maybe it will help people.

Please reblog this. It may help someone down the road, even if you don’t know anyone with dyslexia.

cokekitty:

OpenDyslexic is a free-to-use font that is designed to help those with dyslexia read better. The text is weighted, having a heavier bottom, which is thought to increase readability for dyslexic people. You can download it for free here.

I don’t have dyslexia myself, but in the event any of my followers do, I thought I’d share. Maybe it will help people.

Please reblog this. It may help someone down the road, even if you don’t know anyone with dyslexia.

(via thepoliticalfreakshow)

Filed under dyslexia typeface font opendyslexic signal boost

1 note

FREE WRITING 27

“What’s wrong?”

She hesitated. “That depends. Was last night a one-time thing? My answer will depend on your answer. If it’s a no, then I’ll lie. If yes, then I’ll give you the truth. So please say yes because it’s effortless to be honest to you. I don’t want to ever lie to you.”

“Of course not.”

She smiled. “I just feel like crying. Nothing happened today. I just want to cry. Nothing more, nothing less, no rhyme, no reason. Even though you’re here and your presence puts me at ease, I would still like to cry.”

You wrapped her arms around her, nuzzling your nose into the side of her neck. You whispered something that I could not hear.

I knew what you said to her, and I did not like it. But it’s your life to live.

It’s your heart to bear. It’s your love to give.

And clearly, I would never receive your love.

Filed under free writing prose fiction creative writing

2 notes

Me:
Why do all your examples involve sex with goats? What do they do in the South?
Prof. Drake:
Well, why are you Northerners so aggressive while driving?
Me:
And why do you sound nothing like Gregory Peck? And why is your son named Owen when his proper name should be Jem? And what happened to Scout?
Prof. Drake:
... Oh my god, you're taking my class next semester.
Me:
And it's the seminar class, so it's the ENTIRE year.

Filed under to kill a mockingbird

1 note

Prof. Frank:
I have this nice watch. Wife gave it to me for our fiftieth anniversary.
Me:
Is it worth anything?
Prof. Frank:
... No. Why?
Me:
It's nothing special. It just determines whether or not I'll follow you to your car after class.

1 note

Prof. LeClair:
So, what happened in this case?
Me:
Everyone died because the barnacle was so ugly.
LeClair:
Ha, I loved that episode!
Everyone else:
......... What?

Filed under spongebob the ugly barnacle

4 notes

Prof. Frank:
If an immigrant gets caught selling marijuana, what should happen to him?
Me:
Nothing. He's merely partaking in the American ways of capitalism. He's engaged in a private business venture that the government should not infringe upon.

Filed under political satire

99,059 notes

mohandasgandhi:

sad-teeth:

So today Angelina Jolie had double mastectomy, which is the removal of one’s breasts, to prevent Breast cancer. So instead of praising Angelina on her bravery, men on Twitter decided to ridicule her, even calling her stupid for removing her breasts. For those of you on Tumblr that are attacking Feminists for being delusional about sexism against women and misogyny here’s your fucking proof that sexism and misogyny exists. 

Our celebrity obsessed culture may be a joke but breast cancer definitely isn’t - nearly 500,000 people die from it every year. Angelina Jolie’s doctors estimated she had an 87% risk of developing breast cancer and a 50% risk of developing ovarian cancer because she carries the common gene mutation that causes both. Her mother died at the age of 56 after a long battle with cancer as well. My own mother had both breast and ovarian cancer within a couple short years and let me tell you, it’s about the least funny thing in the world to watch someone suffer from.

Valuing someone’s body parts you sexualized over their life and humanity goes beyond sexism, it’s sub-human.

OBVIOUSLY, your boobs determine:

  • your sex appeal
  • whether or not you should get a life-saving medical procedure
  • the loyalty of your fan base
  • how much attention you receive

(via abhortion)

Filed under social issues angelina jolie

1 note

I’m going to ruminate on this past semester, so I’ve queued some good gems I’ve had in conversations with professors.

It’s the Quintessential Emma Moments or something.